Citizens often complain that speed traps are little more than a cash grab from the government. Often, it’s unclear just how true that is, but in West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, we now have evidence of it.
Read the full article at yahoo!autos
Summary of Constable Resignation Over Speed Camera Program
Quick Overview
In West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, Constable Ron Tetzel resigned after implementing a controversial speed camera program that issued over 4,000 tickets in just two weeks. His resignation letter highlighted the program’s intention to generate revenue, leading to significant public backlash and legal scrutiny.
Key Points
- Mass Ticketing: The speed camera program issued 4,000 citations in two weeks, generating approximately $600,000 in potential revenue.
- Legal Issues: The constable’s office lacked the legal authority to issue these citations, as they had not established the necessary agreements with the school board.
- Public Outcry: Local officials, including state senator Caleb Kleinpeter, publicly condemned the program as a “money grab” and advised citizens not to pay the tickets.
- Constable’s Admission: In his resignation letter, Tetzel admitted the program was intended to raise funds for his office, citing inadequate compensation and resources.
- Political Fallout: The program’s fallout has led to criticism of local officials, including accusations of negligence from the state attorney general’s office.
Detailed Breakdown
Mass Ticketing and Revenue Generation
The controversial speed camera program, initiated by Constable Ron Tetzel in October 2024, was positioned as a safety measure near a local school. However, in a mere two weeks, over 4,000 speeding tickets were issued, each carrying a $150 fine. This rapid issuance could have generated approximately $600,000, with funds intended to be divided among the constable’s office, the camera company, and the school district.
Legal Authority and Public Response
Despite the substantial revenue potential, the constable’s office lacked the legal authority to enforce these citations. According to local news reports, the necessary cooperative endeavor agreement with the school board had not been established, rendering the tickets illegal. The local police department even took to social media, advising citizens against paying the fines. State senator Caleb Kleinpeter echoed this sentiment, stating, “I just got off the phone with Attorney General Murrill who has told me to inform all DO NOT PAY this civil violation.”
Constable’s Admission of Intent
In a resignation letter dated March 12, 2025, Tetzel confessed that the program’s primary goal was to generate revenue for his office. He expressed frustration over his monthly stipend of just $380 and the personal resources he had to utilize for his job. “I never expected or intended to get rich doing this service, but I equally did not expect to have to dedicate so many personal resources to my own safety or ability to do this job,” he wrote. His admission of the program’s revenue-driven nature sparked further outrage from the community and local officials.
Political Fallout and Implications
The fallout from this incident has broader implications for local governance and law enforcement practices. The criticism directed at Tetzel and local officials raises questions about accountability and the ethical implications of using law enforcement for revenue generation. Kleinpeter’s remarks about the situation highlight a growing concern regarding the transparency of governmental operations and the need for proper oversight in traffic enforcement measures.
Notable Quotes & Data
- “This is nothing but a money grab,” stated Senator Caleb Kleinpeter regarding the illegal ticketing.
- Tetzel’s resignation letter revealed, “In an effort to evolve this office… we engaged with multiple entities… to conduct traffic photo enforcement.”
Context & Implications
This incident reflects a significant tension between public safety measures and revenue generation tactics employed by local law enforcement. It raises critical questions about the ethical boundaries of speed enforcement programs and the necessity for clear legal frameworks to govern such initiatives. As communities grapple with the implications of this case, it may lead to calls for reform in how traffic laws are enforced and the oversight of law enforcement agencies.