TLDR: Residents of Edgewood are divided over the installation of school zone cameras, with some viewing them as essential for safety while others see them as a revenue-generating tool for the city. The debate highlights concerns about traffic safety, the allocation of funds, and the effectiveness of the cameras in reducing speeding.
In Edgewood, a heated debate has emerged regarding the installation of school zone cameras intended to enhance safety around local schools. While city officials assert that these cameras are crucial for protecting children, many residents argue that they primarily serve as a source of revenue for the city.
The Purpose of the Cameras
According to Mayor Dave Olson, the primary goal of the school zone cameras is to create safer streets for children. The cameras are strategically placed around Hayden Elementary School, Edgemont Junior High School, and Northwood Elementary School, monitoring speeds in areas where the limit is set at 20 miles per hour.
Despite the mayor’s claims, there is a growing sentiment among residents that the cameras are more about generating income than ensuring safety. An online petition calling for the removal of the cameras has garnered over 600 signatures, reflecting a significant portion of the community’s discontent.
Community Perspectives
Opinions on the cameras are sharply divided. Some residents believe that the existing safety measures, including supervision by guardians and designated pickup zones, are sufficient to protect children. One resident stated, “I think the kids are safe already. I think they are really well supervised.”
Conversely, others feel that the cameras are a necessary tool for maintaining safety in the area. A supporter of the cameras remarked, “Edgewood is a nice area, a safe area, and I think it’s a good thing for the parents to feel safe when their kids are going to school.”
Impact on Traffic Violations
Since the installation of the cameras in 2021, the number of traffic citations has significantly decreased. Initially, there were close to 8,000 citations issued annually, but this number has dropped since the cameras were put in place. Mayor Olson noted that even with increased traffic volume in school zones, the cameras have been effective in changing driver behavior.
Financial Implications
The financial aspect of the cameras has also come under scrutiny. Mayor Olson revealed that the cameras have generated approximately $500,000 annually, but a substantial portion—$400,000—goes to the camera company. The remaining $100,000 is allocated to a contract with the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office for law enforcement services. Critics argue that if the revenue is not directly benefiting the schools or enhancing safety, then the cameras should be reconsidered.
Calls for Alternative Solutions
Some residents have suggested that instead of relying on cameras, the city should increase police presence in school zones to enforce speed limits and issue tickets. This perspective emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to traffic enforcement that prioritizes both safety and community trust.
Conclusion
The debate over school zone cameras in Edgewood encapsulates broader concerns about traffic safety, community trust, and the allocation of municipal funds. As residents continue to voice their opinions, the city faces the challenge of addressing these concerns while ensuring the safety of its children. The outcome of this discussion may shape the future of traffic enforcement in Edgewood and influence how similar issues are approached in other communities.