Georgia’s School Zone Speed Cameras: A Battle Between Reform and Ban
TLDR: The Georgia legislature is debating the future of school zone speed cameras, with proposals for both banning and reforming the system. While some lawmakers advocate for a complete ban due to concerns over revenue generation and erroneous tickets, others argue for reforms to improve safety without dismantling the system.
In Georgia, a contentious debate is unfolding regarding the future of school zone speed cameras. These automated systems, designed to enhance safety near schools, have come under scrutiny for their effectiveness and fairness. A proposal to ban these cameras has gained traction in the legislature, but there are also calls for reform rather than outright elimination.
The Proposal to Ban Speed Cameras
A bill introduced by State Representative Dale Washburn aims to terminate the use of automated school zone speed cameras. This proposal has recently advanced to a vote in the House after receiving approval from the Motor Vehicles Committee. Washburn’s argument against the cameras centers on the belief that they prioritize revenue generation over child safety. He stated, “When we see the deceit and trickery involved in this, the design is not for children’s safety. The design is to write tickets and rake in revenue.”
Background on Speed Cameras
The cameras were authorized by a law passed in 2018, leading to their installation near schools across the state. Violations captured by these cameras can result in fines ranging from $75 to $150, which can be a significant burden for low-income individuals. Washburn highlighted the impact of these fines on working-class families, stating, “It might be taking groceries off the table. They need that money to feed their children.”
Issues with the Current System
Investigations by the Fox Five I-Team revealed that the speed camera systems are prone to errors. Misalignments between camera timers and flashing school zone lights have misled drivers, resulting in unjust tickets. Refunds totaling over half a million dollars were issued to affected drivers in various cities, including Jonesboro, Riverdale, and Atlanta. Washburn emphasized the need for a ban to prevent the continued growth of this problematic system.
The Case for Reform
Despite the push for a ban, not all lawmakers agree with Washburn’s approach. Some representatives from city governments and camera companies argue that reforming the existing system is a more viable solution. Senator Max Burns has introduced a competing bill, Senate Bill 75, which proposes to limit ticketing to specific hours during school drop-off and pick-up times, rather than throughout the entire school day.
Proposed Reforms
Burns’ reform measure includes provisions for better signage and speed feedback signs that inform drivers of their speed before entering school zones. He noted that many drivers are unaware that speed limits are reduced during school hours and that blinking lights are not required by school districts. The goal of these reforms is to maintain safety while addressing the concerns raised about the current system.
The Lobbying Influence
The debate over speed cameras is not just a legislative issue; it also involves significant lobbying efforts. Campaign finance records indicate that camera companies have contributed substantial amounts to political action committees, with over $215,000 donated to the Georgia House Republican Trust since 2023. This financial backing raises questions about the influence of money in shaping policy decisions regarding speed cameras.
Conclusion
As the Georgia legislature continues to grapple with the future of school zone speed cameras, the outcome remains uncertain. Washburn’s bill has gained momentum, but the presence of competing reform proposals and the influence of lobbyists complicate the situation. The discussion highlights the broader issues of public safety, revenue generation, and the impact of automated enforcement on communities. Whether the cameras will be banned or reformed, the debate underscores the need for a balanced approach that prioritizes the safety of children while considering the financial implications for families.