Lawmaker who introduced bill to ban school zone cameras says they do nothing but rake in revenue

February 2, 2025 • 20:56

A new bill in the General Assembly could ban all those school zone speeding cameras across the state of Georgia.

Read the full article at WSB-TV


Summary of Bill to Ban School Zone Cameras in Georgia

Quick Overview

A new legislative proposal in Georgia aims to ban school zone speeding cameras, introduced by Republican lawmaker Dale Washburn. This initiative follows numerous complaints from the public regarding perceived unfair ticketing practices. While some cities argue that these cameras are essential for child safety, critics claim they primarily serve as revenue-generating tools.

Key Points

  1. Legislative Proposal: Dale Washburn has introduced a bill to eliminate school zone speeding cameras across Georgia, citing abuse of the system.
  2. Public Complaints: The push for the bill comes after hundreds of complaints regarding unfair tickets issued by these cameras.
  3. Revenue Concerns: Critics argue that the cameras are designed more for profit than for ensuring safety, with some municipalities reportedly making significant revenue from ticketing.
  4. Counterarguments: Supporters of the cameras, including some city officials, argue that they are crucial for maintaining safety in school zones and that a complete ban could endanger children.
  5. Legislative Progress: The bill has passed out of committee and is set for a vote in the full House.

Detailed Breakdown

Legislative Intent

Lawmaker Dale Washburn has been vocal about his belief that the school zone camera system is “abusive.” He argues that the intention behind these cameras is not to enhance safety but to generate revenue through ticketing. Washburn pointed to a small town in North Georgia that, despite having a modest budget of $400,000, managed to raise over $1 million from a single school zone camera, highlighting the financial incentives that may overshadow safety concerns.

Public Response and Complaints

The introduction of the bill is largely fueled by public outcry. Hundreds of complaints have surfaced regarding the fairness of tickets issued by these cameras, with many citizens feeling that the system is rigged against them. This sentiment has garnered significant attention and support for Washburn’s initiative.

Safety vs. Revenue Debate

While the bill has gained traction, some municipalities are pushing back. Decatur Mayor Patti Garrett emphasized that the cameras are used correctly in her city to promote safety. She cautioned against a blanket ban, stating, “If guardrails are needed, then that’s the way to go rather than…burn down the barn to get rid of the weeds.” This highlights a critical debate: how to balance the need for safety with concerns over potential revenue exploitation.

Expert Opinions

Former director of the Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety, Bob Dallas, who now represents a camera company, supports the idea of limiting the use of cameras rather than abolishing them entirely. He argues that removing these cameras could make school zones less safe, undermining the very purpose they were designed to serve.

Notable Quotes & Data

  • Dale Washburn: “It is clear that this system is abusive… The design is to write tickets and rake in revenue.”
  • Mayor Patti Garrett: “If guardrails are needed, then that’s the way to go rather than…burn down the barn to get rid of the weeds.”
  • A small town in North Georgia raised over $1 million from a single school zone camera despite having a $400,000 budget.

Context & Implications

The proposal to ban school zone cameras in Georgia reflects a broader national conversation about the role of automated traffic enforcement in public safety and revenue generation. As more municipalities adopt such technologies, the implications of this bill could set a precedent for how similar systems are managed across the country. The outcome of this legislative push may influence future discussions about traffic safety measures and their funding mechanisms, as well as shape public trust in local government practices.

In conclusion, while the bill has gained momentum due to public dissatisfaction, it faces significant opposition from those who view school zone cameras as necessary for child safety. The upcoming vote in the Georgia House will be a pivotal moment in this ongoing debate.

Summary Generated by Galaxy.ai Article Summarizer