Good news.
Town officials announced on Tuesday that the Traffic Enforcement Safety Devices ordinance, which would have authorized the use of automated traffic enforcement safety devices, or ATESDs, was denied after a referendum.
Read the article at NBC Connecticut
Quick Overview
The town of Kent has recently voted against the implementation of red light cameras, a decision that has sparked discussions regarding traffic safety and enforcement in the community. The ordinance, which aimed to authorize automated traffic enforcement devices, was rejected by a significant margin in a recent referendum.
Key Points
- Referendum Results: The proposed Traffic Enforcement Safety Devices ordinance was denied with a vote of 391 to 100.
- Purpose of the Ordinance: If approved, the ordinance would have allowed for the installation of red light cameras in school and pedestrian safety zones to monitor speed and issue fines for violations exceeding 10 miles over the speed limit.
- Financial Considerations: The town sought approximately $46,000 to purchase two automated traffic enforcement devices.
- Community Reaction: The topic has generated mixed responses from residents, as seen in discussions from neighboring Bristol, where opinions on red light cameras vary.
Notable Quotes & Data
The town officials announced the referendum results, emphasizing the community’s decisive stance against the proposed cameras. The significant vote difference highlights a strong public opinion against automated traffic enforcement in Kent.
Context & Implications
The rejection of red light cameras in Kent reflects broader debates about traffic enforcement measures and their effectiveness in enhancing road safety. This decision may influence future discussions about traffic management strategies and community engagement in similar initiatives. The town’s next steps regarding traffic safety remain uncertain, as the community grapples with balancing enforcement and public sentiment.