Voters will have the opportunity to decide whether speed cameras should be installed in town to deter speeding cars at Tuesday’s referendum.
Read the full article at NewsTimes
Speed Camera Referendum: Kent Residents to Decide on Traffic Safety Measure
Quick Overview:
The town of Kent, Connecticut, is holding a crucial referendum where residents will vote on the installation of speed cameras and appropriate funding for traffic safety enforcement. This vote follows Washington’s recent distinction as the first Connecticut municipality to implement automated traffic enforcement.
Key Points
- Referendum scheduled for Tuesday at Kent Town Hall (6 p.m. to 8 p.m.)
- Proposed $46,296 funding for two speed cameras
- Fines: $50 for first violation, $75 for subsequent infractions
- Cameras would be placed in school zones and pedestrian safety areas
- Violations occur at 10+ mph over speed limit
Detailed Breakdown
Proposed Implementation
The draft ordinance outlines the installation of “automated traffic enforcement safety devices” in strategic locations approved by the state Department of Transportation. These devices would capture evidence of violations, including license plate numbers, date, time, and location of speeding incidents.
Financial and Administrative Aspects
- Two-tier fine structure proposed
- Specific budget allocation of $46,296 for equipment
- State DOT oversight required for camera placement
- Implementation in designated safety zones
Local Context and Leadership Perspective
First Selectman Martin Lindenmayer frames the initiative as a safety enhancement tool, noting the town’s increasing diversity and visitor traffic. The proposal emerged from discussions beginning in January, followed by a “spirited” public hearing in November.
Notable Quotes
- “I look at this and my board looks at this as an opportunity to enhance the safety of the increasing diverse and large number of people in Kent as well as the people coming to Kent,” - First Selectman Martin Lindenmayer
- “The town will have their say and hopefully they’ll see that as a tool and something we could use to enforce more safer speeds and safety in town for people,” - Lindenmayer
Context & Implications:
This referendum represents a significant moment in Connecticut’s evolving approach to traffic enforcement. Following Washington’s precedent, Kent’s decision could influence other municipalities considering similar measures. The vote reflects a broader debate about automated traffic enforcement and its role in community safety.
The outcome will determine not only the immediate implementation of speed cameras but also potentially set a precedent for how other Connecticut communities approach traffic safety measures. The referendum highlights the balance between technological enforcement and community input in local governance.