Note a lot of scameras zones have no yellow light when hot!
In fact Atlanta TV station blew the lid on zones with yellow lights off but still “citing” illegally as the zone was suppose to be higher when light off for two years!
Another zone was illegally placed well beyond a school zone in violation of law!
One of the biggest problems with the scamera industry is no state laws requiring the AG to investigate camera companies who ignore state law, falsely accuse owners, or even verify equipment is working correctly yearly (not the vendors or “officers” rubber stamping a computer screen).
There is no criminal penalty on vendors or officers who break the law themselves by illegal zones for example!
It must become criminal for vendors to police themselves! The AG needs to do this, not vendors or so called officers part the scheme).
“Dickey said Zebulon Road’s cameras are especially unfair because it’s long been a 4-lane road with a 45 mph speed limit that suddenly drops to 25 mph, even though no one ever sees school kids near the road.”
Read the full article at MyMCR.net
Summary of “Lawmakers Eye Ban on Speed Cameras as Fines Hit $8 Million”
Quick Overview
In response to increasing public discontent regarding speed cameras, Macon-Bibb lawmakers are preparing to propose a ban on these devices in the upcoming legislative session. The move comes as data reveals that local drivers have incurred over $8.8 million in fines, raising questions about the effectiveness and fairness of automated traffic enforcement.
Key Points
- Legislative Action: Local lawmakers plan to introduce a bill in January aimed at banning speed cameras in the Macon-Bibb area.
- Financial Impact: The fines collected from speed camera violations have exceeded $8.8 million, leading to significant public outcry.
- Public Sentiment: There is a growing perception among residents that speed cameras primarily serve as revenue-generating tools rather than safety measures.
- Safety Concerns: Proponents of the cameras argue they are essential for reducing speeding and enhancing road safety.
- Potential Consequences: If the ban is enacted, it may lead to a decrease in revenue for local municipalities but could also alleviate concerns regarding unfair traffic enforcement.
Detailed Breakdown
Legislative Action
Macon-Bibb lawmakers are set to take action against speed cameras, with intentions to propose a ban during the next legislative session. This initiative reflects a broader trend seen in various regions where speed enforcement technologies are being scrutinized.
Financial Impact
The financial burden on drivers has been substantial, with fines from speed camera tickets totaling more than $8.8 million. This figure highlights the economic implications of automated enforcement and has fueled calls for legislative reform.
Public Sentiment
Many residents express frustration, believing that speed cameras are more about generating revenue than ensuring public safety. This sentiment is echoed by lawmakers who have noted the adverse effects of these fines on constituents, prompting discussions about the ethical implications of such enforcement measures.
Safety Concerns
Supporters of speed cameras argue that these devices are critical for reducing traffic violations and improving safety on the roads. They cite data suggesting that areas with speed cameras have experienced a decrease in accidents and fatalities. However, critics argue that the cameras may not effectively address the root causes of speeding and could lead to unjust penalties.
Potential Consequences
The proposed ban could significantly impact local government budgets that rely on fine revenue. Conversely, it may also alleviate concerns from the public regarding the fairness of traffic enforcement practices. The debate raises important questions about balancing revenue generation with public safety and civil liberties.
Notable Quotes & Data
- Macon-Bibb lawmakers have noted the “overwhelming financial impact” of speed camera fines on local drivers.
- The reported fines exceeding $8.8 million illustrate the scale of the issue and the potential for legislative change.
Context & Implications
The discussion surrounding speed cameras is part of a larger national conversation about traffic enforcement methods and their implications for civil liberties. Lawmakers’ willingness to consider a ban reflects a growing acknowledgment of public sentiment and the need for legislative oversight in automated enforcement practices.
As lawmakers prepare to introduce this ban, the outcome could set a precedent for how speed enforcement is managed in other jurisdictions. The implications of such a decision extend beyond Macon-Bibb, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts across the country.
In conclusion, the proposed ban on speed cameras in Macon-Bibb highlights the tension between public safety and revenue generation, raising critical questions about the role of technology in law enforcement and its impact on community trust.