Red light traffic cams are a significant topic in the car world. However, some cities around the country have been less receptive to them than others. Now, the City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, could be facing a massive class action suit over using these high-tech cameras to ticket drivers instead of police traffic stops. Something similar has already happened in New Orleans.
Read the full article at Motorbiscuit
Summary: Baton Rouge Drivers Could Be Owed Millions for Illegal Red Light Camera Citations
Quick Overview
A class action lawsuit against the City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, is progressing, potentially resulting in significant financial compensation for drivers who received illegal red light camera citations. The suit, which has been in the works since 2018, challenges the legality of the city’s red light camera program, asserting it violates local laws regarding traffic enforcement.
Key Points
- Class Action Certification: Judge Kelly Balfour has certified the class action lawsuit, allowing it to proceed similarly to past cases in Louisiana.
- Legal Basis for the Suit: The lawsuit argues that red light citations must originate from police traffic stops, not automated cameras, as stipulated by the home rule charter of East Baton Rouge.
- Financial Implications: Approximately 250,000 citations have been issued, with collections nearing $40 million as of 2021, possibly increasing to $50 million due to interest.
- Comparative Legal Precedents: A similar case in Orleans Parish resulted in a $26 million judgment against the city, which remains unpaid and could now be around $50 million due to accruing interest.
- Future Legal Actions: The attorney representing the plaintiffs is also considering additional lawsuits against the school board concerning the use of traffic cameras.
Detailed Breakdown
Class Action Certification
The lawsuit against Baton Rouge has gained momentum following the certification by Judge Kelly Balfour on December 2, 2024. This legal acknowledgment allows the case to move forward, paralleling other successful lawsuits in the state regarding red light camera usage.
Legal Arguments
The core argument of the plaintiffs hinges on the interpretation of local laws. Joe McMahon, the attorney for the plaintiffs, emphasizes that traffic enforcement is a function of the police, not the Department of Public Works, as established in the ordinance that initiated the camera program. This misalignment with the home rule charter forms the basis of the legal challenge.
Financial Impact
The financial stakes are considerable. With an estimated 250,000 tickets issued since the program’s inception in 2007, the city has collected nearly $40 million from fines. McMahon suggests that this amount may have grown by an additional $10 million, indicating the potential liability for Baton Rouge could reach upwards of $50 million when factoring in interest.
Legal Precedents
The implications of this lawsuit are underscored by a similar case in Orleans Parish, where a judge mandated a $26 million payout for illegal red light camera citations. The fact that this judgment remains unpaid raises questions about the city’s accountability and the potential financial burden on Baton Rouge if the current lawsuit succeeds.
Future Considerations
In addition to the ongoing class action, McMahon is contemplating further legal action against the local school board for its involvement in the red light camera program. This could widen the scope of accountability and financial repercussions for local authorities.
Notable Quotes & Data
- Joe McMahon stated, “These camera companies come in, they pitch a bill to a councilman… and say it’s all about public safety, but you’ll make a lot of money.”
- The lawsuit estimates that “there are probably at least 250,000 tickets that have been issued,” with collections from 2021 reported at just under $40 million.
Context & Implications
The Baton Rouge case reflects a growing scrutiny of automated traffic enforcement systems across the United States. As cities increasingly rely on technology for traffic management, legal challenges like this one may reshape the landscape of traffic law enforcement. The outcome could set a precedent that influences similar programs in other jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established legal frameworks in public safety initiatives.
Overall, the Baton Rouge red light camera controversy raises critical questions about governance, public safety, and the financial implications of automated enforcement systems. As the case unfolds, it will likely attract significant attention from both legal experts and the public.